Albertacos V.S Jack in the Box


It was one in the morning and everybody was starving. The decision of where to eat caused an intense argument of which is better, Jack in the Box or Albertacos. I claimed that Jack in the Box was the best choice because it had more options to choose from, while Albertacos is based more around just Mexican food. My friend, Michelle, claimed that Albertacos tastes better and is closer. I supported my claim stating that enjoying the food doesn't compare to how far it is. She supported her claim by stating that the quality of Jack in the Box  doesn't compare to Albertacos. She basically was saying that Jack in the Box sucks. She wouldnt budge about how she felt and neither would I. This argument is an example of the use of logos. Its logos because it's based on generalization. A weakness of this argument can be the fact that it's one in the morning and no one makes sense. Also, that this is based on opinion and there wasn't enough evidence to support each claim. In the end no one won the argument. Instead, we took two separate cars, one to Jack in the Box and one to Albertacos. The argument wasn't successful but it just shows us how loyal we are to our food.